Bihar Law Department Notice 8769 dated 27 October 2026 invites willingness for 13 professional Supreme Court engagements: 3 Additional Advocate General and 10 Additional Standing Counsel. This is not a regular pay-scale recruitment. The governing Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules, 2023 require Indian citizenship, Bar Council registration, three preceding years as an income-tax assessee and normally ten years of advocacy; the AAG clause also recognizes a designated Senior Advocate route. Use the signed, photographed A4 willingness form with enrolment certificate, Bar Council/Association ID and three prior ITRs. Email, speed post/courier or hand submission to the Advocate General office in Patna is permitted within 15 working days of official website publication. Under Rule 4, selection is by committee assessment/recommendation followed by Government engagement order; no written test, syllabus, admit card, fixed remuneration, caste roster or exact calendar closing date is published.
Organization information attached to this recruitment record.
Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. State government authority responsible for the engagement of Law Officers including Additional Advocate General and Additional Standing Counsel under Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules, 2023.
Recruitment-specific overview from the published record.
Bihar Law Department Supreme Court Law Officer Engagement 2026 — Notice 8769 (27 October 2026): 13 positions. The Bihar Government is inviting willingness, not ordinary applications for a regular salaried recruitment examination. Three posts are Additional Advocate General and ten are Additional Standing Counsel, for representation of the State of Bihar before the Supreme Court of India. The notice and its A4 application format are hosted in the Law Department's 28 October 2026 latest-news directory. The controlling eligibility and appointment framework is the Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules, 2023, published in the extraordinary Bihar Gazette on 4 July 2023. Neither a fixed monthly salary nor a written-examination syllabus is announced. This is legal professional engagement, subject to panel scrutiny and the Government's order—not an automatic permanent-service appointment.
| Particular | Verified position |
|---|---|
| Issuing authority | Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna |
| Notice number and signature | Ref. 8769, dated 27 October 2026 |
| Official portal upload | 28 October 2026 |
| Work represented | Bihar Government before the Supreme Court of India |
| Additional Advocate General | 3 |
| Additional Standing Counsel | 10 |
| Combined notified posts | 13 |
| How to respond | Prescribed A4 willingness format via email / speed post / courier / hand delivery |
| Submission destination | Office of the Advocate General, Bihar, High Court, Patna |
| Time allowed | 15 working days from website publication, not an independently printed closing date |
| Written exam / exam syllabus | Not announced |
| Fixed remuneration / salary scale | Not specified; fees or facilities determined/notified by Law Department |
| Recruitment framework | Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules, 2023 |
The distinction is post designation, not caste-reservation distribution. The notice does not publish an SC/ST/OBC/EWS/UR seat matrix. Do not convert post counts into a reservation pie.
📊 Bihar Supreme Court Law Officers — Vacancy Composition
| Designation | Vacancies |
|---|---|
| Additional Advocate General (Supreme Court) | 3 |
| Additional Standing Counsel (Supreme Court) | 10 |
Total notified posts: 13.
The ten Additional Standing Counsel positions account for roughly 76.9% of the announced engagements; three Additional Advocate General positions represent roughly 23.1%. These are mathematical shares of positions, not announced candidate-category reservations.
A second chart compares the ordinary minimum advocacy standing under Rule 6(4)(a) and 6(4)(c). This is not a mark-weightage graph or a forecast of selection likelihood.
📊 Minimum Qualifying Advocacy — 2023 Rules
| Role | Minimum practice (years) |
|---|---|
| Additional Advocate General — normal practice route | 10 |
| Additional Standing Counsel — Supreme Court | 10 |
Exception: The Additional Advocate General route in the 2023 Rules alternatively recognizes a designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court or the Patna High Court; this must be read as a rule-specific pathway, not a blanket waiver for Additional Standing Counsel. The 2023 Rules supersede the older 2021 rules. Do not quote 15 or 20 years from superseded texts.
Indian citizenship and advocate enrolment. The legal gateway is participation in the advocate profession with enrolment under the Advocates Act, 1961. Bar Council enrolment evidence is mandatory in the notice's annexure. The form asks separately for the Advocate-on-Record (AOR) number; applicants should provide their actual number where applicable, rather than invent one. The notice does not say every candidate must already hold an AOR number.
Place and length of practice. Rule 6 encompasses advocates, designated Senior Advocates and Advocates-on-Record practising in courts including the Supreme Court/Patna High Court. The relevant category is Supreme Court engagement: applicants must evaluate their proof of active court practice, years, cases and relevant legal work rather than just a generic LL.B. completion date.
Tax status. The rule specifies being an income-tax assessee for at least the past three financial years. The form asks for assessment year, income and income tax during the last three years, together with copies of the ITRs. Tax return documents are therefore not an optional decorative attachment.
Disqualification and professional independence. Rule 7 contains restrictions concerning criminal-case representation by a serving Law Officer, conflicting private instructions, adverse interests, election matters, electoral/public-office status, involvement in bodies advising Government, and other conflicts. The willingness format asks candidates whether they have had any criminal or disciplinary proceeding. A truthful disclosure is essential; the official notice does not announce that every disclosed proceeding automatically leads to rejection.
Age and fee. No numerical upper/lower age or application fee is printed in the three-page notice. Age should display Not specified. It is wrong to import general civil-service age limits, examination fees or reservation relaxations from unrelated recruitment advertisements.
The official PDF contains the notice on page 1, the actual writable form on page 2, and an attachment list on page 3. Applicants must follow the form as issued. The printed form asks for the following particulars:
| Official form row | Required information | Applicant's practical check |
|---|---|---|
| 1–5 | Advocate's name, father/husband's name, DOB, PAN, full address, mobile and email | Keep spellings consistent across Bar documents, PAN and returns |
| 6 | Bar Council enrolment number | Attach self-attested enrolment certificate |
| 7 | Advocate-on-Record number | Enter actual AOR number if held; do not invent |
| 8–9 | Courts and location of practice, Bar Association and length of practice | Include clear, verifiable chronology |
| 10 | Designated Senior Advocate — Yes/No | Required especially when relying on the senior-advocate route |
| 11 | Earlier panel / empanelment / engagement | Disclose prior Government panel duties accurately |
| 12 | Criminal/disciplinary proceeding disclosure | State actual facts; concealment jeopardizes suitability |
| 13 | Last three years' income tax paid, assessment years and income | Cross-check figures with attached returns |
| 14 | Declaration, place, date and advocate signature | Sign the original form and keep a copy |
The form calls for an affixed recent photograph, is to be written clearly and concisely on A4 paper, and is part of the notice—not a separately invented online application.
The official page 3 document list is short and important:
The candidate should also prepare the filled, signed, photographed willingness format (page 2). For practice years, Supreme Court matters, professional standing and previous engagement, keep supporting proofs ready if requested by the scrutiny committee. Those additional practice records are prudent preparation, not additional enclosures explicitly listed on page 3. There is no officially prescribed personal-statement word count, upload-size limit or online account-registration step in this notice.
Destination: Office of the Advocate General, Bihar, High Court, Patna. The official page 1 accepts email at advocategeneralbihar@gmail.com, speed post/courier, or delivery by hand. These are alternative submission methods, not three separate applications.
Email route: scan the signed A4 format with the required self-attested documents, send a clear subject identifying Notice Ref. 8769 — Willingness for [exact designation], and retain sent-message/time evidence. The example subject is editorial advice; the notice does not prescribe an email subject.
Physical route: print the notice form, attach the listed copies, deliver/send a clearly addressed packet to the official Advocate General office, and retain the courier receipt or receiving acknowledgment. Postal dispatch before deadline does not automatically establish timely receipt; allow time for delivery.
Correct designation: say whether seeking Additional Advocate General or Additional Standing Counsel. The form is a general willingness format; do not assume one can automatically claim both positions with a single ambiguous packet.
Deadline trap: It says 15 working days from the date of publication on the Law Department website. The document is dated 27 October and hosted in a 28 October upload folder. These are not the same thing as an officially printed calendar end date. Websites quoting 16 or 17 November are using differing assumptions about the first counted day and holidays. A hard calendar deadline has therefore deliberately not been entered into the database field. Confirm the applicable 15-working-day counting/holiday position with the issuer; submit well before the earliest plausible date. Do not rely on an unverified exact closing hour.
Stage 1 — Willingness received and documentary scrutiny: The appointing authorities first receive the prescribed format and verify Bar enrolment, years of qualifying court practice, tax documents, truthful disclosures and suitability.
Stage 2 — Selection Committee under Rule 4: The committee consists of the Advocate General of Bihar as Chair, the Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer of the Law Department and the relevant Special/Joint Secretary-cum-Additional Legal Remembrancer. Professional law experts may be co-opted. Under the rules, a committee prepares a suitable panel taking account of experience and suitability. The notice does not prescribe a marks formula or MCQ examination.
Stage 3 — Government order and category-specific engagement: The panel recommendation proceeds through the Law Department for a Government engagement order. Sending willingness, satisfying ten-year practice or being shortlisted does not by itself entitle anyone to engagement.
Future updates: Any final order, selected panel or amendment must be confirmed on the official Law Department/Advocate General portals. No official written-test date, admit card, syllabus, answer key, result date, cutoff marks or selection list is announced with Notice 8769. The structured exams, admit_cards, answer_keys, results and cutoffs arrays are intentionally empty rather than fabricated.
Additional Advocate General — Supreme Court: A senior public-law advocate assists and represents the State in substantial Supreme Court proceedings, develops positions on significant constitutional, civil, revenue, regulatory and criminal-law matters entrusted to the office, manages complex pleadings/hearing strategy, and coordinates official litigation instructions. These are role interpretations of the Law Officer's Rule 8 duties, not a separate job description promised by Ref. 8769.
Additional Standing Counsel — Supreme Court: The advocate represents Government interests in assigned Supreme Court cases, prepares petitions/replies/affidavits, tracks procedural deadlines, assists filing, coordinates with departments and senior counsel, and ensures Government matters are diligently prosecuted or defended. These responsibilities flow from Rule 8 legal duties, not from an advertised numerical target for daily cases.
For both, conflicts of interest and service instructions matter. Rule 7 places significant restrictions on accepting briefs from private parties while engaged as a Law Officer. Rule 8 describes legal advice and appearance duties. Rule 12 permits fees/retainer/allowances determined by Government from time to time; it does not supply a fixed salary.
No monthly pay, pay matrix, annual CTC, grade pay, or fixed fee per hearing is printed in Notice 8769. Paragraph 7 explicitly places professional fees and facilities (if any) under the Law Department's separately determined/notified terms. Rule 12 similarly refers to fees, retainer and allowances set by Government. Salary / remuneration: Not specified.
Do not present this as a ₹50,000 or ₹1,00,000/month regular government post. Do not assume provident fund, pension, uniform pay scale, accommodation, automatic renewal, or a five-year service contract. Rule 3 and Rule 10 discuss engagement at Government pleasure and disengagement; the precise future terms follow the engagement order, not an imagined generic contract.
The primary notice is unusually short, so it must be read alongside the 2023 Rules rather than filled out with a generic Sarkari Naukri template. The notice establishes 13 openings, two professional designations, the office receiving willingness, permitted delivery channels, the submission window and the legal basis of selection. The Gazette supplies substantive professional qualification, selection, conduct, duties and post-engagement conditions. The difference matters because a professional engagement is not a permanent appointment with a Pay Matrix level, pension and a competitive written-exam ranking.
| Question | What the notice actually establishes | What remains to be announced/verified |
|---|---|---|
| How many? | AAG 03; Additional Standing Counsel 10 | No SC/ST/OBC/EWS/UR roster |
| Who? | Interested eligible advocates under the 2023 Rules | No LL.B. subject-wise percentage or university preference list |
| When? | Within 15 working days after publication on the Law Department website | No explicit DD-MM-YYYY closing date or closing hour |
| How? | Prescribed willingness; e-mail, speed post/courier, or hand delivery | No separate applicant login or online test registration |
| How selected? | Rule 4 Selection Committee; Government decision | No official written-test marks, interview calendar or candidate-wise ranking formula |
| How paid? | Fees and facilities as separately decided/notified | No rupee amount, monthly slab, grade pay or CTC |
| Where will duties be? | Supreme Court of India matters for Bihar | No separate daily office attendance posting order in notice |
Publication-date warning 📅: The signature reads Patna, 27 October 2026; the PDF is hosted under an 28-Oct-2026 publication/upload path. A date printed in the link path should not be substituted for an explicit publication-time register. If a person independently counts working days without accounting for official holidays or the portal's precise publication date, they may miscalculate. Applicants should verify the deadline with the receiving office and submit before the end of the permissible period. The common 17 November date on some third-party portals is an inference, not a fixed date printed in this three-page notice.
Rule 3(2) recognizes Additional Advocate General, Standing Counsel and Additional Standing Counsel for work in the Supreme Court of India; the present notice recruits AAG and ASC only. Rule 3 also makes the Government the engaging authority. The availability of a third statutory designation, Standing Counsel, does not create an additional unadvertised vacancy.
Rule 4 — Selection Committee: Advocate General, Bihar, is the chair. The Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, Law Department, and the Special/Joint Secretary-cum-Additional Legal Remembrancer, Law Department, are members. Legal-profession experts may be co-opted. The committee draws up a panel on experience and suitability and recommends it through the Law Department. Only a subsequent Government order establishes an engagement. The committee can formulate its own procedure for seeking willingness and preparing the panel. Neither the notice nor this rule prescribes a CBT, fixed scorecard, written law syllabus or compulsory interview duration.
Rule 4 special-case proviso: The rules allow recommendations by the Advocate General in particular exigencies within the specified ceiling of 15% of sanctioned posts. That is a limited administrative engagement proviso; it is not a 15% reservation, a vacancy increase to be added to the 13 advertised posts, or a mark-allocation chart.
Rule 6 — eligibility: (a) citizenship of India; (b) Advocate registered with a competent Bar Council under the Advocates Act, 1961; (c) relevant professional category/standing; (d) income-tax assessee for at least the last three financial years; and (e) absence of the rule's public-office ineligibilities. The normal legal-practice threshold is 10 years for both advertised designations. For AAG, Rule 6(4)(a) separately recognizes a designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court or Patna High Court route. For ASC, Rule 6(4)(c) states ten years' advocacy and does not repeat that AAG exception. The rule does not say that all 10 years must be served as a government lawyer or that merely working in a law office counts automatically as enrolled practice.
Rule 7 — disqualification/conflicts: The restrictions concern private criminal briefs for a serving Law Officer, civil briefs that interfere with official duties, representation against the Government's interests, election petitions, legislative/local-authority office, conflicting work for statutory bodies, incompatible ongoing private retainers, and ceasing to be an advocate or conviction for moral-turpitude offences. A candidate should examine existing briefs and employer/client arrangements before accepting engagement; the fact that the form asks about prior criminal/disciplinary matters does not justify automatically treating every disclosed allegation as a final disqualification without applying the rule.
Rule 8 — actual legal duties: Advise Bihar Government on assigned legal matters; appear for and prosecute/defend proceedings for the Government and its officials as allotted or directed by the Advocate General; perform other legal functions conferred under applicable law. An assignment can entail coordination with Government records, drafting pleadings and reviewing precedents, but the source does not prescribe a fixed daily caseload or a particular specialist litigation portfolio for each of the 13 appointees.
Rule 10 — disengagement: Engagement may be ended by Government under the stated rule and in consultation with the Advocate General on grounds including ineligibility, disqualification or deficient duty performance. A Law Officer may disengage after one month's notice to the Advocate General. This is a materially different relationship from a regular probation-and-confirmation career post.
Rule 11 — performance review: The Advocate General assesses work of Supreme Court/Patna High Court Law Officers annually, and the assessment goes to Government. Unsatisfactory performance can lead to disengagement under the rule. Editorially, this means a selected advocate should plan for demonstrable case preparation, timely advice, effective appearance and auditable professional conduct after appointment—not merely pass initial scrutiny.
Rule 12 — professional remuneration: Fee, retainer fee and other allowances are to be determined by Government from time to time. Not specified is the only supported applicant-facing amount for this notice. Any advertised per-month, per-hearing or package figure without the corresponding official fee order is not verified for Notice 8769.
| Candidate situation | Source-grounded interpretation | Recommended proof/check |
|---|---|---|
| LL.B. completed but not enrolled with a Bar Council | Does not satisfy the express advocate-registration condition | Enrolment certificate, Bar-issued identity |
| Ten years of enrolled practice, but no three-year tax-assessee record | The 2023 eligibility rule contains an additional tax-status condition | Last three financial years' ITR copies and assessment details; seek official clarification if circumstances unusual |
| Designated Senior Advocate applying for AAG | Rule 6(4)(a) has a distinct alternative that must be evaluated as written | Senior designation details, court, enrolment and other applicable Rule 6 prerequisites |
| Ten-year advocate seeking ASC with no Supreme Court appearances disclosed | The rule says at least ten years' practice as advocate; the role is for Supreme Court work. Actual relevance/suitability is for the committee | Disclose genuine courts of practice and relevant cases. Do not invent an extra ten-year exclusively Supreme Court requirement |
| Present member of legislative or local authority | Rule 6(5)/Rule 7 state an ineligibility while holding the specified office | Disclose present office accurately |
| Prior disciplinary case/ongoing criminal matter | Form asks for disclosure; outcome depends on actual facts and applicable legal standards | Truthful entry in row 12, supporting explanation if requested |
AOR number vs enrolment number: The form asks separately for an Advocate-on-Record number and a Bar enrolment number. Do not copy the enrolment number into the AOR field. An applicant who is not an AOR should not manufacture an AOR identity; the main notice itself has not declared AOR registration a universal stand-alone requirement for all applicants.
Step 1 — obtain the unmodified form. Download the Department's three-page PDF; use the willingness form printed on page 2. Write the notice reference 8769 and date, identify the exact role to which willingness relates, and attach a recent photograph where indicated. The notice asks that the application be on A4 paper, legible and succinct. Do not substitute a generic job-site bio-data form for this prescribed format.
Step 2 — perform a document-to-form cross-check. Match name/DOB/PAN/contact details to the relevant identity documents. List the Bar enrolment number with dates accurately. Where applicable, enter the actual AOR number, court locations, association, length of practice and Senior Advocate status. Disclose past panels and criminal/disciplinary matters truthfully. The three assessment years, income and tax entries should correspond to the actual return copies.
Step 3 — prepare the exact official enclosures. The notice's page 3 explicitly lists: (1) enrolment certificate; (2) ID card issued by a Bar Association/Council; and (3) copies of income-tax returns of the preceding three years. The format itself asks for self-attested enrolment evidence. Keep the signed/photographed completed willingness application with these enclosures. Any additional case list, practice certificate or prior empanelment record should be identified as optional supporting preparation unless the receiving authority requires it.
Step 4 — choose one officially accepted delivery method. Either send the signed, clear scanned set by e-mail to advocategeneralbihar@gmail.com, or send the physical packet by Speed Post/Courier, or deliver by hand at the Office of the Advocate General, Bihar, High Court, Patna. The notice explicitly permits these routes; it does not require paying an online examination fee or submitting three duplicate applications by every route.
Step 5 — keep evidence of timely submission. For email retain the sent-mail record/attachments and confirm that the address was typed exactly. For physical dispatch keep receipt, consignment number and delivery evidence; for hand delivery seek receiving acknowledgment where offered. This is practical applicant advice, not a separate condition printed in Notice 8769.
Step 6 — verify official subsequent communications. The notification states that selection under Rule 4 follows willingness. Look for official communications, requests for supplementary evidence, committee/department notices and a Government engagement order. Any selection-panel document, joining instruction or fee order will be a future event, not a pre-announced date.
| Form box | Official prompt | Common avoidable mistake |
|---|---|---|
| 1–4 | Name; father/husband name; DOB; PAN | Divergent spellings or an unexplained DOB |
| 5 | Address, mobile and e-mail | Missing reliable contact details |
| 6–7 | Enrolment number; AOR number | Confusing two different professional numbers |
| 8–9 | Court/practice location, Association, length of practice | Claiming ten years without accurate dates/locations |
| 10–11 | Senior Advocate designation; earlier engagement/panel | Unsupported yes/no or undisclosed past panel |
| 12 | Criminal/disciplinary proceeding | Leaving required disclosure blank instead of answering truthfully |
| 13 | Last three assessment years, income and tax | Mixing assessment and financial years, or inconsistent ITR figures |
| 14 | Declaration and signature | Unsigned form or missing photograph |
| Lifecycle phase | Official status as of Notice 8769 | What a serious applicant should monitor |
|---|---|---|
| 📜 Notification | Issued: Ref 8769, 27 October 2026 | Changes/addendum via the official Law Department / Advocate General websites |
| 📨 Application/willingness | Open period specified: 15 working days from website publication | Signed A4 form; correct place/email and three enclosures; official deadline interpretation |
| 🔎 Document/eligibility review | Provided under the rules, no specific date | Enrolment, ten-year experience/alternative AAG route, three tax years, ethical eligibility |
| ⚖️ Selection panel | Rule 4 process, meeting date not published | Experience/suitability assessment and committee recommendation |
| 🧪 Written examination | Not announced | No invented law MCQ pattern, passing score, exam centre or subject percentages |
| 📚 Written-exam syllabus | Not published | Read Gazette Rules and relevant professional requirements as preparation; they are not an official written syllabus |
| 🎫 Admit card/call letter | Not issued or scheduled in the notice | Future contact/official notification if authorities later announce a separate assessment |
| 🗝️ Answer key / objection window | Not applicable to any announced written test | Do not publish a dummy answer-key date |
| 🏁 Result / merit list | No date/method published | Committee recommendations and Government engagement order are the relevant outcomes |
| 💰 Fee/retainer order | Not specified in rupees | Separate Law Department/Government fee notification and engagement terms |
| 📝 Acceptance of engagement | Subject to Government order | Review conflicts, terms, duties and reporting instructions |
| 📈 Review after engagement | Rule 11 annual review | Quality of representation, timely legal advice and compliance |
| 🚪 Disengagement | Rule 10 governs, subject to order/rules | Government action under rule or officer's one-month notice |
Editorial distinction: No exam announced ≠ proof that the committee may never ask for clarifications, interactions or additional documents. But an interview date, exam centre, cut-off score, exam paper, hall ticket or model answer key cannot be advertised as confirmed without a fresh official notice. The structured exams, admit_cards, answer_keys, results and cutoffs arrays are intentionally empty until a real lifecycle event is publicly substantiated.
The rule permits selection on experience and suitability. This is qualitative rather than a stated 100-mark formula. The following matrix explains relevant evidence; the Department has not allocated points or weights to any column.
| Professional dimension | Useful, truthful applicant evidence | Not an official fixed score |
|---|---|---|
| Bar standing | Valid enrolment, admission-to-practice chronology and relevant court history | No invented 20 marks |
| Supreme Court litigation familiarity | Actual proceedings, case roles and procedural familiarity where applicable | No compulsory AOR mark unless announced |
| Independent legal judgment | Relevant pleadings, arguments, research and advisory experience | No guaranteed advantage or fixed percentage |
| Public-law/government matters | Verifiable prior state/government work, if any | No automatic eligibility relaxation |
| Ethics and conflict management | Accurate prior briefs, litigation conflicts, declarations and records | No blanket ban on every unrelated past case |
| Financial/compliance documentation | Three required tax years and complete professional identity documents | Mandatory eligibility is not a separate scoring category |
Illustrative professional preparation, not a released syllabus: an experienced advocate can revisit constitutional and administrative litigation principles, maintain command of the Supreme Court Rules, case chronology, limitation, SLP drafting, affidavits, precedents and ethical obligations to a government client. These are meaningful elements of professional readiness only as editorial guidance. The Department has neither issued an exam syllabus nor told applicants to prepare an MCQ test on these areas.
| Dimension | Additional Advocate General (03) | Additional Standing Counsel (10) |
|---|---|---|
| Formal legal grade | AAG under Rule 3(2)(a) | ASC under Rule 3(2)(c) |
| Normal practice rule | Rule 6(4)(a): 10 years or designated Senior Advocate option | Rule 6(4)(c): 10 years' advocacy |
| Government representation | Supreme Court matters assigned under Rule 8 | Supreme Court matters assigned under Rule 8 |
| Professional focus (editorial illustration) | May involve strategic opinions, substantial litigation and coordination on complex pleadings | May involve assigned case preparation, procedural filings, replies, appearances and coordination |
| Published fixed case-load / specialty allocation | Not specified | Not specified |
| Published separate fee scale | Not specified | Not specified |
| Final engaging authority | Bihar Government | Bihar Government |
The position-specific illustrations describe plausible ways the broad Rule 8 duties could be discharged; they are not additional KRA quotas that the three-page recruitment notice states. Neither position is a newly announced regular judicial appointment, nor is the three-versus-ten distinction a caste reservation breakup.
If Bihar Law Department or the Advocate General releases an amendment, update dates and the source links with the exact file and date. If an actual assessment/interview notification is issued, add its confirmed dates and scope to the selection lifecycle; do not retrofit a written-exam syllabus merely because many government jobs have one. If a candidate panel or Government order is issued, report that as the verified outcome with the order number and selected names when officially published. If professional fee orders become available, update the applicant-facing remuneration section and salary_details on the basis of their stated fee units; do not translate a per-appearance retainer into a speculative monthly salary.
This article is a practical guide to the issued 2026 notice and the 2023 legal rules; subsequent documents can change deadlines or engagement conditions and should take precedence where lawfully issued.
Q1. Are there 13 vacancies? Yes: 3 AAG and 10 Additional Standing Counsel. The notice has no further reservation-wise breakup.
Q2. Can a newly qualified LL.B. graduate apply? Not on degree alone. Bar enrolment and Rule 6's applicable experience/other conditions govern eligibility.
Q3. Is an AOR certificate essential for everyone? The form requests AOR number; Rule 6 also recognizes other advocate categories. The notice does not expressly require every candidate to be an AOR. Do not create a fictional number.
Q4. What is the minimum experience? Ten years of advocacy on the normal Rule 6 route for each advertised Supreme Court category; designated Senior Advocate exception may apply to AAG as written in Rule 6.
Q5. Where is the job located? The engagement concerns Supreme Court of India litigation (New Delhi); submission happens in the Advocate General's office at Patna. These must not be confused.
Q6. Can someone without three recent ITRs ignore the requirement? No. The 2023 Rule 6 demands tax-assessee status for three financial years and the application asks for three previous returns. Seek issuer guidance for unusual tax situations rather than inventing an exemption.
Q7. Is there an examination? No written test or syllabus has been announced with this notice. Selection is under Rule 4's committee structure.
Q8. Is there an application fee? No amount is stated. Fee: Not specified, not automatically a verified 'Nil' fee.
Q9. What is the fixed age limit? Not specified in the 3-page notice.
Q10. What is the exact last calendar date? The notice specifies 15 working days after website publication. It does not print a day/month/year closing date. Check office confirmation for holidays/cutoff; send early.
Q11. Do applicants need to upload through a website? No online application form or registration link is published; use the PDF willingness format and the authorized delivery channels.
Q12. Is monthly salary ₹X promised? No. The Government fixes professional fees/benefits separately.
Q13. How is final selection made? Recommendation by the Rule 4 Selection Committee and engagement by Government order; willingness alone confers no right.
Q14. What documents are compulsory? Enrolment certificate, Bar Association/Bar Council ID, three years' ITRs and completed signed photo-bearing A4 willingness form.
Original notice date = 27 October 2026. Portal file directory = 28 October 2026. These are different dates. Do not publish this as a new notification issued on 29 October. Check any later corrigendum/engagement orders on official portals. Specific minimum age, exact final calendar date, written-test syllabus, grade pay and reserved seat breakup are not published in the primary notice; these are deliberately not fabricated.
Open a post to view qualification, experience, age, salary, location, responsibilities and post-specific instructions.
Indian citizen and Bar Council enrolled advocate; for AAG Supreme Court Rule 6(4)(a), a minimum 10 years as advocate on the ordinary route OR designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court/Patna High Court. Tax assessee in three preceding financial years; truthful professional disclosure. Rule 6(3): income-tax assessee in the last three financial years; Rule 6(5): specified public-office holders ineligible while holding office. Form requests AOR number but notice does not require every candidate to be AOR.
Required: Yes · Description: Rule 6(4)(a) normal ten-year practice route or designated Senior Advocate of Supreme Court/Patna HC. Provide courts and location of practice, yearwise professional history and original Bar enrolment. No experience maxima. · Minimum Years: 10
Description: Notice 8769 provides no minimum or maximum age or relaxation policy. Date of birth is collected in the willingness format; no fabricated age bands.
Professional route: Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules, 2023 Rule 6(4)(a) prescribes at least ten years of practice as an advocate or a designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India / Patna High Court. Read that textual alternative accurately: do not generalize it to every Law Officer category. Valid Bar Council enrolment and Indian citizenship remain part of the Rule 6 framework, and the applicant should have been an income-tax assessee during the preceding three financial years.
Courtroom remit: represent the State of Bihar before the Supreme Court in proceedings allocated by the Advocate General/Government, advise departments on legally complex matters, guide pleadings, legal research and strategy on precedent-sensitive cases and assist in resolving litigation instructions. The duties derive from Rule 8 and the role; the three-page notice does not prescribe a separate subject-specific KRA scorecard.
What strengthens a credible submission: show actual court-of-practice locations, length of advocacy, AOR number if held, whether designated Senior Advocate, major relevant appearances, earlier Government panel engagement, accurate criminal/disciplinary disclosures and the most recent three years' returns. An LL.B. qualification or declaration of experience without enrolment and proof is inadequate.
Selection is not a competitive written exam. Under Rule 4 the committee chaired by the Advocate General examines professional suitability and recommends names. A decision and engagement order are reserved to Government. The post count is 3, not an age- or caste-wise roster. No notified fixed monthly salary or fee scale. The notice allows professional fees/benefits subsequently determined by Law Department.
Documents and submission: complete the official A4 willingness form, affix photograph and sign; attach self-attested enrolment certificate, Bar Council/Association identity and copies of three preceding ITRs. Send to Office of Advocate General, Bihar, High Court, Patna via advocategeneralbihar@gmail.com, speed post/courier or hand delivery within 15 working days of official website publication. No fabricated fixed deadline; no written-test date, admit card or syllabus.
Distinct suitability warning: a designated Senior Advocate pathway exists under 2023 Rule 6 for AAG. Do not apply 2021 standing thresholds or assume that an AAG must necessarily possess 15 or 20 years because of superseded rules. The Government's final suitability assessment remains discretionary.
The ordinary Rule 6(4)(a) path is at least ten years of practice as an advocate, with a separate textual path for a designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court or Patna High Court. Applicants invoking the alternate designation should state their true designation and court in the prescribed form; do not represent every experienced advocate as a designated Senior Advocate. The Gazette additionally requires citizenship, Bar Council registration and the relevant last-three-financial-year tax status. The notice itself does not set an LL.B. marks cutoff, an upper age limit, a compulsory AOR certificate or a minimum number of SLP arguments.
| Evidence | Officially required or editorial preparation? | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Signed A4 willingness + recent photo | Official form, page 2 | Identifies candidate and records declaration |
| Bar enrolment certificate (self-attested copy) | Official list/form | Advocates Act eligibility and professional identity |
| Bar Association/Council ID | Official list, page 3 | Identity corroboration |
| Three years' income-tax returns | Official list, page 3 | Rule 6 tax-assessee condition |
| Senior designation order (if relying on that path) | Supporting evidence, if asked | Substantiates Rule 6(4)(a) alternative |
| Selected casework/previous public-service panel history | Editorial preparation | Can support suitability if requested; no compulsory case-count in notice |
Under Rule 8, the AAG can be assigned Government advice or appearances in litigation where the Bihar Government or its officials have an interest. Professional judgment can involve identifying a constitutional issue, analyzing the effect of a judicial precedent, planning a response to adverse interim relief, advising a Government department on factual records, and ensuring that legal instructions are promptly turned into appropriate filings. These are illustrative professional applications of broad statutory duties—not a notification-specific guarantee of a defined number of constitutional cases.
Rule 7 risk review: a senior legal practitioner often has a substantial existing client docket. On accepting a Government engagement, privately retained criminal briefs, election-related briefs and other adverse/conflicting matters must be assessed against Rule 7; prior private practice does not justify misrepresenting current compatibility. Rule 11 provides for annual performance appraisal, while Rule 10 controls possible disengagement. Professional fees remain Not specified pending a separate decision/order.
FAQ: Does the AAG have a compulsory ten-year requirement even if designated a Senior Advocate? The text of Rule 6(4)(a) contains an 'or' between the normal ten-year route and designated Senior Advocate route. It should be read as written, with other generally applicable Rule 6 conditions intact. The Selection Committee still evaluates suitability; an alternative entry route is not automatic selection.
Represent and advise Bihar Government in Supreme Court matters assigned by competent authority; formulate legal strategy, supervise complex pleadings, coordinate Government records and counsel as per Rule 8 and applicable engagement orders.
No caste/category-wise seat breakup is announced. The notified counts are designations (AAG 3; Additional Standing Counsel 10), not reserved communities.
Indian citizen and enrolled advocate with at least 10 years practice (Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules 2023 Rule 6(4)(c)); income-tax assessee in three preceding FYs. AAG designated Senior Advocate alternative is not an automatic ASC waiver. The ASC Rule 6(4)(c) states ten years as advocate; it does not impose ten years exclusively at the Supreme Court in its literal words, while role suitability still considers relevant courtroom practice. The AAG senior-designation alternative is a separate clause.
Required: Yes · Description: Not less than 10 years practising as an advocate in the relevant professional category per Rule 6(4)(c) of 2023 Rules. Provide court-of-practice and enrolment details; not a generic three-year experience rule. · Minimum Years: 10
Description: Notice 8769 provides no minimum or maximum age or relaxation policy. Date of birth is collected in the willingness format; no fabricated age bands.
Professional route: Rule 6(4)(c) of the 2023 Rules requires not less than ten years' practice as an advocate for the Additional Standing Counsel role in the Supreme Court of India. Registered advocate status, Indian citizenship, relevant standing and three financial years' income-tax assessee status are critical. The exception available to designated Senior Advocates under the separate AAG clause must not be imported to waive the ASC practice-years requirement.
Actual task profile: deal with Bihar Government matters before the Supreme Court; prepare and review appeal/SLP pleadings, affidavits, replies, case notes and authorities, keep close control of limitation and listing issues, coordinate documents/instructions from State departments and conduct assigned appearances. Rule 8 gives the broader duty to advise Government and appear when allotted. These examples illustrate professional duties, not promises that any listed specific case type is guaranteed.
Practice evidence: the original form asks for location and courts of practice, association, length of practice, Bar Council number, AOR number (where held), earlier panel engagement, Senior Advocate status, disciplinary cases, plus three years' tax data. Present truthful and verifiable Supreme Court practice details; do not treat a district legal internship as ten years of advocacy.
Applicant checklist: one signed A4 prescribed willingness format with photograph; Bar Council enrolment certificate (self-attested), identity card issued by Bar Association/Council and preceding three years' income-tax return copies. Submit through the official email advocategeneralbihar@gmail.com or speed post/courier/hand at Office of the Advocate General, Bihar, High Court, Patna. The rule is 15 working days after website publication, not a fixed calendar deadline printed by the department.
Selection and remuneration: a 10-seat law-officer engagement, not 10 newly sanctioned permanent civil-service positions. Rule 4 committee review and recommendation precede Government order. No written exam, score weightage, age ceiling, category breakup or fixed monthly fee is announced. Remuneration: Not specified; Rule 12 and notice paragraph 7 place fees and other facilities under Government notification.
Professional conflict check: Rule 7 can prohibit accepting incompatible private cases and other conduct after engagement; disclose prior empanelment and legal/disciplinary matters honestly. Do not assume one may simultaneously advise adverse private litigants against the State.
Rule 6(4)(c) requires not less than ten years' practice as an advocate for Additional Standing Counsel in the Supreme Court of India. The AAG's designated-Senior-Advocate alternative sits in a different clause and cannot be silently copied here. The requirements for Indian citizenship, Bar Council enrolment and three financial years' tax-assessee status apply. Neither a degree alone nor a mere twelve-month legal internship is equivalent to the stipulated professional standing.
Court practice precision: The Gazette's ASC rule prescribes ten years of practice as an advocate; it does not literally state that each of those years must be exclusively in the Supreme Court. But the vacancy is for Government representation before that court, so evidence of genuinely relevant procedural and litigation experience may matter to Rule 4 suitability review. Candidates should disclose their real courts of practice and relevant matters rather than claiming experience they cannot document.
In a State Government Supreme Court matter, counsel may need to obtain factual instructions from the concerned Bihar department, check the operative orders and deadlines, build a concise chronology, verify affidavits, examine applicable precedents, coordinate filing arrangements and represent the Government as assigned. These tasks illustrate Rule 8's duty to advise and represent; they do not prove that every selected ASC will have a fixed specialty, a daily filing quota or an independent authority to accept conflicting private briefs.
| Workstream | Professional judgment required | Applicable source |
|---|---|---|
| Legal advice | Identify precise issue, statutory provisions and risk to Government | Rule 8(1) |
| Assigned appearances | Prepare for allocated Supreme Court proceedings without neglect | Rule 8(2) |
| Records and case chronology | Coordinate accurate departmental instructions | Illustrative execution of Rule 8 |
| Professional ethics | Avoid criminal/private adverse/conflicting briefs as constrained | Rule 7 |
| Annual review | Maintain reliable work product and responsive case handling | Rule 11 |
| Disengagement/exit | Observe Rule 10 mechanism, including officer's one-month notice | Rule 10 |
FAQ: Are all ten ASC positions reserved for a particular community? No reservation-category matrix is printed; the ten represent designation-specific advertised openings, not SC/ST/OBC/EWS allocations. Is the salary per month guaranteed? No. The notice and Rule 12 provide for Government-determined professional fees; amounts and frequency are Not specified.
Represent Bihar Government in assigned Supreme Court litigation, prepare pleadings and case research, coordinate affidavits and agency instructions, manage filing/listing compliance and appear as instructed under Rule 8.
No caste/category-wise seat breakup is announced. The notified counts are designations (AAG 3; Additional Standing Counsel 10), not reserved communities.
Recruitment-level qualifications and eligibility rules. Post-specific conditions are also shown inside each vacancy card.
Rule 6 of Bihar Law Officers (Engagement) Rules, 2023 requires an Indian citizen enrolled with a Bar Council under Advocates Act, 1961. Mere LL.B. is insufficient.
Rule 6(4)(a): practising advocate with 10+ years experience OR a designated Senior Advocate of Supreme Court or Patna High Court; selection still based on suitability.
Rule 6(4)(c) of 2023 Rules; separate AAG designated-Senior-Advocate alternative should not be treated as automatic ASC exemption.
Rule 6 requires income-tax assessee status for last three financial years. Notice page 2 asks three years tax data; page 3 requires copies of preceding 3 ITRs.
Advocates should review Rule 7 and make true disclosures of criminal/disciplinary proceedings, earlier Government panels and adverse/conflicting private briefs.
The primary notice refers to eligibility in the 2023 Rules and does not print a separate numerical LL.B. percentage or a recognized specific university list. Valid advocate enrolment under the Advocates Act is compulsory; do not infer an unrelated diploma.
Recruitment-level age criteria. Post-specific age conditions remain visible inside each vacancy card.
Post-wise salary, stipend or pay-matrix information.
Not specified. Professional fees/retainer and other facilities (if any) will be separately determined and notified by the Law Department under notice para 7 and 2023 Rules Rule 12. No guaranteed monthly amount.
Not specified. Professional fees/retainer and other facilities (if any) will be separately determined and notified by the Law Department under notice para 7 and 2023 Rules Rule 12. No guaranteed monthly amount.
Selection stages in the order configured for this recruitment.
Notice 8769 permits signed photo-bearing A4 form and three listed attachments through email, speed post/courier or hand at Advocate General Bihar office, Patna. Website publication starts the relative window; no fixed date is printed.
Bar Council enrolment, Indian citizenship, relevant 10-year practice route, AAG designated-Senior-Advocate alternative, three preceding financial years tax-assessee requirement, Rule 6(5) eligibility and form declarations. Specific scrutiny date not announced.
Advocate General Bihar chairs the panel with senior Law Department members; legal experts may be co-opted. No official written examination, marks split, exam syllabus or interview date is prescribed by Notice 8769.
Selection Committee submits an experience/suitability recommendation to Government via the Law Department; recommendation alone is not an engagement order. No result publication date specified.
Government decides and issues any engagement order, with terms. Notice paragraph 7/Rule 12 leave fees and facilities to be separately determined/notified. No guaranteed regular salary or permanent service.
Law Officer must comply with conflict/disqualification rules and perform Government advice and assigned Supreme Court appearances. Duties depend on actual case allotment and Government/Advocate General direction.
Advocate General reviews Supreme Court Law Officers annually; Government may disengage as permitted by rule. Law Officer may disengage on one-month notice to Advocate General. These are post-selection lifecycle rules, not separate pre-appointment examinations.
Application and recruitment milestones published with this job.
Page 1 of official notice.
The URL is filed in the official Law Department 28-Oct-2026 uploads and linked on Law Department Latest News; this is not the signature date.
Application links, notification documents and verified sources in one place.
सरकारी नौकरी, भर्ती, परीक्षा और career information को सरल, सटीक और उपयोगी रूप में समझाने पर केंद्रित