Supreme Court Junior Court Attendant 2026 Interview and Selection Assessment

Supreme Court Junior Court Attendant Interview 2026 — 25 marks and a separate qualifying standard

Following the written objective test, eligible shortlisted candidates may be called for an interview carrying 25 marks. The minimum qualifying score is 13/25. The original recruitment notice does not prescribe a fixed interview duration, panel-question list, section-wise interview marks or a declared final written/interview weightage. It also does not announce an interview date. Do not treat a predicted question bank as an official examination syllabus.

How the interview relates to the written test

The 1:3 provision means the interview is not a guaranteed next step for everyone with 50 marks. With 130 tentative vacancies, a 1:3 comparison is 390 candidates, but that is only an explanation of the stated ratio at the present vacancy figure. The Registry alone determines actual shortlisting and the final merit panel. Passing both minima does not guarantee selection.

Practical preparation connected to the notified job duties

The advertisement names everyday Registry support work: carrying files and paper books, maintaining office furniture and spaces, and serving water, tea, coffee, snacks or other refreshments. Interview preparation should therefore include thoughtful, plain answers about punctuality, following instructions, safely moving documents, keeping work spaces orderly, dealing respectfully with officials and visitors, and the importance of discretion in an institution that handles judicial records. The advertisement does not say these exact questions will be asked; they are realistic reflection topics for someone seeking the advertised role.

An applicant might practise explaining how to manage a file-delivery instruction where two offices request assistance at once: confirm priorities with the authorised supervisor, avoid leaving confidential records unattended and report completion accurately. Another practice scenario concerns an urgent request for refreshments while document movement is pending: communicate clearly instead of making assumptions or misplacing papers. Such judgement illustrates suitability for the stated support duties without implying that the Court has notified a separate practical test.

Document consistency and professional conduct

Bring the original documents requested in the eventual interview communication, with valid category/disability certificates where applicable. Government, PSU, statutory body and nationalised-bank employees are required to produce the necessary No Objection Certificate from the employer before the interview. A candidate who joins employment after applying should inform the Registry and obtain the required NOC. Name changes should be supported by Gazette evidence where the advertisement requires it.

Interviews may be online or physically in Delhi. The Registry has not committed to reimbursement of travel; TA/DA is not payable for the test or interview. Keep the registered mobile number and personal email accessible for correspondence; date and mode will come from official instructions. Do not travel on a guessed interview date.

How selection concludes

Qualified candidates can be empanelled in merit order for appointment consideration, subject to all checks and the Registry's decisions. The advertisement explicitly states that placement on the panel does not confer a right to claim appointment. Treat the 25-mark interview as a separate qualifying checkpoint with meaningful document verification, not a routine automatic formality. The official Supreme Court recruitment page is the source for the interview programme when notified.